March CPI hit 3.3% year-over-year on an energy spike from the Iran conflict; core held at 2.6%, the Fed stays on hold at 3.50–3.75%, and the 10-year yield at 4.29%. The oil shock has not yet reached services; shipping, aviation, and industrials face months of elevated costs before the April 28–29 FOMC convenes. Inside crypto, last week’s short squeeze has inverted: BTC long liquidations ran 8:1 over shorts, a mechanical reset, not a regime change.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Long squeeze replacing short squeeze: BTC long liquidations ran 8:1 over shorts ($53.9M vs $6.4M), the mirror of last week’s 5:1 short-side flush; longs accumulated during the squeeze are now clearing.
  • BTC/ETH correlation rebounded sharply: 30-day correlation recovered to 0.25x (61st percentile) from -0.31x last week. The decoupling phase appears to be closing; uncorrelated behaviour models should be reassessed.
  • Funding regime bifurcated across the cohort: BTC near neutral at -0.9% APR (38th); ETH and SOL positive at 4.8% and 6.1% APR. Market aggregate remains negative at -3.6% APR (12th percentile).
  • BTC ETF positive 3-session streak, $376M 7-day inflow (75th percentile): ETH diverges on a 2-session outflow streak; both assets are in structurally different institutional demand regimes.
  • MACRO: March CPI hit 3.3% year-over-year with core at 2.6%; the 10-year yield at 4.29% and the Fed on hold at 3.50–3.75%. Rate cut expectations have shifted to Q4 2026.

Crypto market summary BTC and ETH. Crypto market funding rates for BTC and ETH

crypto market liquidity BTC and ETH. Spread and depthcrypto market positioning BTC and ETH OI on perps and futures

 

crypto market ETF flows for BTC and ETHcrypto market Stablecoins BTC and ETH

crypto market DeFi lending AAVE v3

Market

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Altcoin prices near 90-day lows across the board: AAVE and UNI at 90-day lows, BNB at the 3rd percentile, XRP at the 7th, and SOL at 11th. BTC and ETH are the only assets with readings above the 50th percentile.
  • BTC/ETH 30-day correlation recovered to 0.25x (61st percentile): Last week’s -0.31x reading was a 90-day low. The reversal is sharp; cross-asset hedging models adjusted for decoupling now face the inverse risk.
  • Derivatives-to-spot ratios elevated against depressed spot volumes: ETH at 6.88x and SOL at 6.57x, both above the 75th percentile. Spot volumes at or below the 25th percentile; price discovery is derivatives-led.

BTC holds at $70,715 (57th percentile) and ETH at $2,190 (65th), but the wider cohort remains under pressure: AAVE and UNI at 90-day lows, BNB at the 3rd percentile, XRP at the 7th. The BTC/ETH 30-day correlation has snapped back to 0.25x (61st) from -0.31x last week. Derivatives-to-spot ratios remain elevated (ETH 6.88x, SOL 6.57x, both above the 75th percentile) against spot volumes at or below the 25th percentile.

Price snapshot for major crypto coins

CHARTS

Crypto major altcoins price performance 90 DayRealized volatility for bitcoin and ethereum
spot volume growth and derivatives mix (90 day) on major ALTS Price vs VWAP spread (90 Day) BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, BNB

 

BTC ETH correlation (90 day)

DETAIL TABLES

volatility and distribution for ALTSVolume snapshot for Altcoins
BTC ETH correlationPer venue volume for BNB, Binance, ETH, SOL and XRP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liquidity

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Spreads at or below the 25th percentile across all three assets: BTC 0.1 bps (15th), ETH 0.7 bps (18th), SOL 1.8 bps (20th). Tight spreads reflect depressed volatility, not deep books; execution cost understates actual market impact.
  • BTC depth concentration at 15th percentile (24.1%): Book depth is fragmented across levels, not stacked near mid. Institutional-sized orders will face market impact higher than the $227M headline figure implies.
  • ETH bid imbalance at 4th percentile (47.9%): Sell-side pressure dominates ETH’s book at the 10-bps tier, consistent with the VWAP spread at the 17th percentile and persistent late-session selling.

Spreads are tight across the cohort: BTC at 0.1 bps (15th percentile), ETH at 0.7 bps (18th), SOL at 1.8 bps (20th). For BTC, tight spreads coexist with depth concentration at the 15th percentile (24.1%), meaning the book is fragmented; institutional execution will carry higher market impact than the $227M headline figure implies. ETH’s bid imbalance at the 4th percentile (47.9%) confirms sell-side pressure at the top of the book.

Order book for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana

CHARTS

order book depth and structure for BTC, ETH and SOLBid-Ask Spreads for BTC, ETH, and SOL

DETAIL TABLES

Bid/Ask Imbalance for BTC ETH and SOLPer Venue depth and spread BTC

 

 

 

 

Spread and market quality for crypto ETHDepth change summary 7 day for Solana

Rates

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • BTC funding is near neutral at -0.9% APR (38th percentile): A sharp recovery from -4.2% last week; the short squeeze has been absorbed, and BTC funding carries no strong directional bias at current levels.
  • ETH and SOL funding positive and elevated: ETH at 4.8% APR (85th), SOL at 6.1% APR (91st); longs in both pay a meaningful daily carry cost. Sustained rates at this level historically precede position reduction.
  • BTC basis near a 90-day low at 1.0% APR (1st percentile): Futures premium has compressed almost entirely. Near-zero basis eliminates the cash-and-carry incentive and signals weak forward demand for BTC exposure.

BTC funding has normalized to -0.9% APR (38th percentile) from -4.2% last week, confirming the short squeeze has run its course. ETH and SOL remain positive at 4.8% (85th) and 6.1% APR (91st); longs in both carry a meaningful daily cost. The market aggregate remains negative at -3.6% APR (12th percentile). BTC basis compressed to 1.0% APR (near a 90-day low), reducing cash-and-carry incentives.

funding rate snapshot for Altcoins, AAVE, AVAX, BNB, BTC, DOGE, ETH, LINK, SOL, UNI, WLFI, and XRP

CHARTS

crypto funding rate heatmapAmberdata DAS Apr 12 Image 27
Futures basis term structure BTC Basis APR by tenorBTC and ETH Futures term spread 90 day

DETAIL TABLES

SOL, ETH and BTC basis term structureAmberdata DAS Apr 12 Image 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

crypto market average funding

Positioning

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • BTC long liquidations 8:1 over shorts ($53.9M vs $6.4M): Last week’s short squeeze has mechanically inverted. Longs accumulated during the squeeze are now being flushed; this is a clearing event, not a fresh directional breakdown.
  • BTC and ETH L/S ratios near a 90-day low: BTC at 0.96x (1st percentile), ETH at 1.30x (2nd). Net positioning is near its most bearish reading in the rolling window; the market is not crowded long.
  • Open interest elevated despite the liquidation event: BTC OI at 74th percentile ($27.07B), ETH at 76th ($16.77B). High OI with low L/S ratios and long-side liquidations points to a crowded short building against an elevated book.

The liquidation picture has inverted: BTC long closures totalled $53.9M against $6.4M in shorts, an 8:1 ratio, the reverse of last week’s short squeeze. Open interest remains elevated at BTC 74th percentile ($27.07B) and ETH 76th ($16.77B). Long/short ratios for BTC (0.96x, near a 90-day low) and ETH (1.30x, 2nd percentile) confirm net positioning is structurally bearish, with upside risk concentrated in any forced short-covering event.

Open interest and positioning for major altcoins in crypto

CHARTS

Open interest and leverage ratio 30 day for BTC ETH SOL XRP BNBlong/short ratio 90 day BTC, ETH and SOL

Bitcoin liquidations: longs vs shorts

DETAIL TABLES

long/short ratio AAVE, AVAX, BNB, BTC, DOGE, ETH, LINK, SOLLiquidations snapshot major altcoins

 Per venue open interest for BNB, BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP

ETF Flows

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • BTC ETF on a 3-session positive streak, $376M in 7-day inflows (75th percentile): One of five regime-change criteria is now satisfied. The other four, including positive funding, stablecoin velocity, and macro easing, are not simultaneously present.
  • ETH ETF on a 2-session outflow streak: -$6.7M daily, -$4.7M on a 7-day basis (17th percentile). ETH demand remains below BTC; the 1.6% vs 7.1% holdings gap is a persistent relative-value discount.
  • BTC AUM near $99.9B with holdings at 7.1% of supply (above 75th percentile): ETF structural ownership constrains available float; incremental institutional demand has an outsized spot price impact from this level.

BTC ETF flows are on a 3-session positive streak with $376M in 7-day net inflows (75th percentile); AUM near $99.9B and holdings at 7.1% of supply (above 75th percentile). ETH diverges on a 2-session outflow streak at -$4.7M on a 7-day basis (17th percentile). BTC satisfies one of five regime-change criteria; ETH’s 1.6% holdings and persistent outflows confirm both assets are in different institutional demand regimes.

ETF flow snapshot BTC and ETH

CHARTS

BTC ETF AUM and daily flows 90 dayETH ETF AUM and daily flows

DETAIL TABLES

Crypto ETF issuers breakdown

Stablecoin

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • USDC supply at 90-day highs, $634M in 7-day net minting (above 75th percentile): Dominance at 24.9% (above 75th). Capital is entering the on-chain ecosystem via USDC, a constructive supply-side signal even before velocity is assessed.
  • USDT velocity at 1.70x (below 25th percentile) despite $183.9B in supply: Low transactional turnover on the largest stablecoin confirms capital is sitting idle. The risk-off hoarding profile from last week remains in place.
  • PYUSD stands out on both velocity and minting: Velocity at 2.03x (above 75th), mint/burn ratio 1.57x (above 75th), 7-day net mint $124M (above 75th). The most active deployment signal in the cohort.

USDC leads the supply expansion: $634M in 7-day net minting (above 75th percentile), supply at $68.4B (80th percentile). USDT at $183.9B carries low velocity at 1.70x (below 25th), consistent with risk-off hoarding, not active deployment. USDe contracts at a 90-day low as DeFi carry unwinds. PYUSD is the exception: velocity at 2.03x (above 75th) and mint/burn ratio of 1.57x (above 75th) signal the most active capital deployment in the cohort.

Stablecoins: USDT, USDC, USDe, USDS, PYUSD, FDUSD, RLUSD, TUSD, USDY

CHARTS

 

stablecoin supply growth (90 day rebases to 100)Stablecoin velocity growth for USDt USDC USDe USDS PYUSD

Stablecoin net mint/burn by chain + ratio 30 day

DETAIL TABLES

stablecoin breakdown by chain

DeFi Lending

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Total DeFi TVL at 8th percentile ($41.77B), near a 90-day low: Utilization at 35.8% (below 25th) and Aave borrow APR at 1.8% (below 25th) confirm a contracting credit environment, not just price-driven TVL compression.
  • Credit is cheap but demand is absent: Low borrowing cost with below-average utilization signals leverage demand is depressed by risk appetite, not cost. Cheap credit is a precondition for recovery, not confirmation.
  • ETH funding flips leveraged-staking carry negative: ETH perpetual funding at 4.8% APR exceeds most LST staking yields of 2.4–2.9%; the borrow-to-stake carry trade is marginally negative, removing a structural TVL support.

Total DeFi TVL sits at $41.77B (8th percentile), near a 90-day low, with utilization at 35.8% (below 25th) and Aave borrow APR at 1.8% (below 25th). Credit is cheap but demand is absent. ETH staking APY holds at 2.6% (33rd percentile); swETH leads at 2.9% (87th). With ETH perpetual funding at 4.8% APR, the leveraged-staking carry trade is marginally negative, removing a structural TVL support.

Amberdata DAS Apr 12 Image 49

CHARTS

 

DeFi credit pulse 90 day. Utilization % and TVLBorrow vs Staking Spread heatmap. MakerDAO Compound v2 Aave V2 Aave v3

DETAIL TABLES

DeFi chain breakdownETH liquid staking APY

Full-Market Research. Institutional Depth. Derivatives, ETFs, on-chain, DEXs, microstructure, risk signals - and more. Subscribe at the bottom of our page for research that covers every corner of crypto and visit Amberdata Research.

Access Amberdata Intelligence for institutional-grade digital asset intelligence, or contact our team to discuss custom solutions.

Links & Resources

Platform

Recommended next reads

Disclaimers

The information contained in this report is provided by Amberdata solely for educational and informational purposes. The contents of this report should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax, or any other form of professional advice. Amberdata does not provide personalized recommendations; any opinions or suggestions expressed in this report are for general informational purposes only.

Although Amberdata has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, it cannot be held responsible for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or outdated information. Market conditions, regulations, and laws are subject to change, and readers should perform their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions or taking any actions based on the information provided in this report.

Past performance is not indicative of future results, and any investments discussed or mentioned in this report may not be suitable for all individuals or circumstances. Investing involves risks, and the value of investments can go up or down. Amberdata disclaims any liability for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of, or reliance on, the information contained in this report.

By accessing and using the information provided in this report, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless Amberdata, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, or expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising from your use of or reliance on the information contained herein.

Michael Marshall

Mike Marshall is Head of Research at Amberdata. He leads pioneering research initiatives at the forefront of blockchain and cryptocurrency analytics. Mike is a seasoned quantitative analyst with a 15-year track record in developing AI-driven trading algorithms and pioneering proprietary cryptocurrency strategies. His...

Amberdata Blog

View All Posts