Share this blog:
Christine Kim shares her unconventional journey from CoinDesk reporter to Ethereum research expert. From navigating tokenomics to breaking down complex governance structures, she offers a masterclass in how to find your voice in crypto.
Watch the episode to hear her insights on what’s changed, what still needs fixing, and how to get involved.
Introduction: From Journalist to Research Leader
Christine Kim, one of the most respected voices in Ethereum research, joined Izzie Henderson, Director of PM, on the Amberdata podcast to reflect on her journey through the digital asset space. From her early days at CoinDesk to leading research at Galaxy Digital and now as an independent analyst, Christine has specialized in unpacking complex topics like Ethereum protocol upgrades, tokenomics, and governance structures. Her career path mirrors the trajectory of crypto itself, emerging from a chaotic, unstructured environment into a more mature, but still experimental, landscape.
Breaking In: Meritocracy in the Early Crypto Days
Christine's entry into crypto began with her senior thesis on the economics of Bitcoin. Inspired by her sister, an early BTC investor, Christine applied for a CoinDesk internship in 2018. At that time, the industry operated with few gatekeepers. Hiring decisions were based on skills and curiosity rather than credentials or networks.
“People didn’t really care what college I went to or who I knew. They cared about what I could do.”
Her strength in writing quickly translated into a full-time role covering Ethereum, DeFi, and early-stage infrastructure development. She was one of the first to deeply document Ethereum’s protocol upgrade process, bridging the knowledge gap between core developers and the broader ecosystem.
Transition to Research: From Reporting to Thought Leadership
Over time, Christine recognized that reporting was limited by the need for speed and headline-driven content. She transitioned to CoinDesk’s newly formed research team, led by her mentor Noelle Acheson, where she began conducting deeper, data-driven explorations of Ethereum’s inner workings.
When the research division at CoinDesk was eventually disbanded, Christine moved to Galaxy Digital. Despite initial reservations about working for a centralized crypto firm, she was reassured by the team’s emphasis on research independence. Under the guidance of Galaxy’s Alex Thorn, Christine flourished, refining her niche in Ethereum protocol development.
“At Galaxy, we informed product teams—but also had the freedom to publish objective analysis for clients and the public.”
Ethereum: A Platform for Innovation and Transparency
Christine explains that Ethereum captivated her because of its open architecture, vibrant developer culture, and public development process. Unlike more opaque projects, Ethereum's client calls, GitHub discussions, and governance debates are all transparent.
Key Points on Ethereum’s Appeal:
-
Generalized Computation: Ethereum’s EVM allows arbitrary code execution, enabling decentralized applications and protocols.
-
Developer Accessibility: Core developers like Tim Beiko make themselves available, and client calls are open to the public.
-
Tooling & Data: Resources like Amberdata make it easy to monitor both off-chain governance and on-chain activity.
“The transparency part of Ethereum made it not only interesting but accessible.”
Building a Research Framework for Protocols
Christine emphasizes a repeatable framework for evaluating open-source protocols:
1. Understand the Protocol's Purpose
Start with first principles: what does the protocol enable? For Ethereum, it's generalized smart contracts. For others, it might be data availability, throughput optimization, or cross-chain interoperability.
2. Understand the Development Structure
Know whether the project is truly decentralized or controlled by a single entity (e.g., a foundation or core team). Is development open-source? Are meetings and decisions public?
3. Identify the Key Players
Map out contributors: core devs, foundations, governance bodies, ecosystem partners. Understand where influence and decision-making power lie.
4. Find Pain Points and Solve Them
Christine’s early reporting filled a gap, summarizing dev calls for wider audiences. This kind of value-add is how new contributors can establish a reputation.
Tokenomics: Beyond Utility to Monetary Policy
While many focus on token use cases (e.g., governance, gas), Christine warns that the supply dynamics, issuance schedules, unlocks, and insider allocations are often more important for long-term value.
“A token’s utility is just one part. You also need to understand its monetary policy and distribution schedule.”
Common Oversights:
-
Supply Schedules: Is the token inflationary or deflationary?
-
Holder Concentration: How much is held by insiders or VCs?
-
Transparency: Is the emission curve clearly published and verifiable?
She calls for improved industry standards around tokenomics disclosures and applauds efforts from data providers (like Amberdata), research firms (like Arca), and media (like Blockworks).
Governance: Experimental and Still Gameable
Christine draws a sharp line between token-based governance and off-chain governance.
-
Token-based voting (e.g., DAOs): Easily gameable, vulnerable to plutocracy, and still in experimental stages.
-
Off-chain governance (e.g., Ethereum): Based on rough consensus, social norms, and dev coordination, harder to measure but more resilient.
She highlights futarchy as a promising but early-stage alternative governance model being explored in prediction markets.
Institutions, Regulation & the Road Ahead
On regulatory clarity, Christine believes most true base-layer protocols (Bitcoin, Ethereum) are designed to resist censorship and regulatory capture. However, most dApps and tokenized products will live or die by how favorable the regulatory environment is.
Key Takeaways:
-
Regulatory regimes (like in the US) are shaping which products gain traction, e.g., the rise of stablecoins and RWAs.
-
Institutions still struggle with due diligence frameworks, especially around tokenomics and governance risks.
-
Investor protection remains an open question globally, with countries like South Korea and the EU taking more conservative approaches than the U.S.
Final Thoughts & Advice
Christine closes with advice for aspiring researchers:
“Persistence. Do not get let down if you try something and it fails. Keep going. Keep tweeting. Keep writing your thing. Don’t stop because one person said no.”
She also teases a broadening of her research scope beyond Ethereum and hints at deeper dives into other protocols.
TL;DR
Christine Kim’s story offers a roadmap for how to build credibility in crypto: start with curiosity, identify underserved niches, and stay relentlessly persistent. Her technical depth, especially in Ethereum governance and token design, continues to shape how the industry understands the mechanisms behind the blockchain.
