In this week’s Digital Asset Snapshot, market sentiment remains cautious despite the Federal Reserve holding interest rates steady and signaling potential cuts later this year. Economic uncertainties persist, highlighted by modest retail growth, recession predictions among corporate finance leaders, and renewed trade tensions elevating inflation concerns. Crypto markets, notably Bitcoin, rallied briefly in response to the Fed’s dovish stance but continued to experience volatility, reflecting investor uncertainty and strategic repositioning within institutional ETF flows. Investors remain attentive to shifting macroeconomic signals, balancing optimism for potential easing against persistent inflationary pressures and trade risks.
The Federal Reserve maintained its benchmark interest rate at 4.25%–4.50% on March 19, highlighting elevated economic uncertainties and signaling two potential rate cuts by year's end. Despite projecting slower economic growth and persistently above-target inflation, Chair Jerome Powell emphasized the economy’s current resilience, citing stable unemployment figures. Stocks rallied on the news, interpreting the Fed’s decision as a sign of upcoming monetary easing.
In cryptocurrency markets, Bitcoin surged approximately 4.5%, nearing $85,500—its highest since early March—as investors embraced risk assets in response to the Fed’s dovish outlook. Ethereum and Solana followed suit, each rising roughly 7%. However, analysts caution that trade-related inflation risks remain, potentially impacting sentiment and crypto’s recent gains if conditions deteriorate.
U.S. retail sales rose marginally by 0.2% in February after January’s significant drop, underscoring consumer caution amid rising economic uncertainty. Spending cutbacks, particularly in discretionary categories like restaurants and entertainment, indicate waning consumer confidence, now at its lowest point in two and a half years. Despite the subdued figures, markets took comfort that spending is not collapsing, reducing immediate recession fears.
Bitcoin held steady around $84,000, mirroring broader market sentiment that interpreted the soft data as confirmation of slower, but not negative, economic growth. Traders remain cautiously optimistic, suggesting crypto markets currently balance between the potential of sustained consumer-driven growth and the threat of deeper slowdowns, which could prompt volatility in risk-sensitive digital assets.
A recent survey reveals growing pessimism among U.S. CFOs, with 60% forecasting a recession by late 2025 due to ongoing uncertainties stemming from aggressive U.S. trade policies and persistent inflationary pressures. CFOs also anticipate that Treasury yields will remain elevated at 4%–5%, reflecting expectations of sustained high borrowing costs, complicating corporate planning and investment decisions.
Against this backdrop, traditional safe havens, such as gold, reached record highs above $3,000, while Bitcoin similarly benefited from hedging strategies against macroeconomic uncertainty. However, experts highlight that persistently high interest rates could eventually temper crypto market enthusiasm, potentially limiting Bitcoin’s role as a reliable hedge should borrowing costs remain restrictive.
President Trump’s decision on March 28 to impose a 25% tariff on imported automobiles sparked renewed fears of inflation escalation. The move, effective April 3, immediately increased market volatility, pushing U.S. Treasury yields upward and significantly raising inflation expectations. Investors fear tariffs will elevate consumer prices and curb spending, amplifying existing economic uncertainties.
Cryptocurrencies reacted negatively to the heightened inflationary and macroeconomic concerns, with Bitcoin retreating around 1.8% to about $85,700. Ethereum and Solana faced sharper declines, losing 4.4% and 3%, respectively. The risk-off sentiment demonstrated that despite Bitcoin’s inflation-hedge narrative, immediate market reactions continue to align more closely with traditional risk-sensitive assets, suggesting vulnerability amid macroeconomic volatility.
U.S. GDP growth was revised upward to 2.4% for Q4 2024, accompanied by persistently strong employment data, with jobless claims remaining unexpectedly low. Such indicators reflect surprising resilience in the U.S. economy, complicating the Fed’s path toward interest rate cuts, as the central bank sees less urgency to reduce rates amid stable growth and controlled inflation.
Cryptocurrency markets have responded cautiously, with Bitcoin stabilizing in the mid-$ 85,000 to $88,000 range. The robust economic data tempered earlier enthusiasm fueled by anticipated monetary easing. Crypto traders appear to weigh the benefits of sustained economic health against the challenge of prolonged high interest rates, resulting in balanced, range-bound market activity.
The Federal Reserve’s core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index rose 0.3% monthly and 2.6% annually in February, remaining stubbornly above the 2% inflation target. Despite a slight undershoot of forecasts, the figures underscore ongoing inflationary pressures, intensified by recent tariffs and input cost increases. Consequently, markets predict continued cautious Fed policy, with few immediate prospects for rate cuts.
Bitcoin traded sideways around mid-$85,000 levels following the inflation data release, reflecting investor uncertainty about future policy direction. Market participants remain closely attuned to inflation trends, understanding that sustained high inflation could pressure the Fed into prolonged restrictive policy, limiting speculative investments such as crypto, whereas signs of inflation moderation could fuel bullish sentiment and renewed risk appetite.
Shifting Supply Dynamics Reflect Investor Caution
Between January and March, Bitcoin experienced significant price volatility, peaking at approximately $106,000 in January before retreating sharply to about $84,000 by February, and then modestly recovering to near $87,000 in March. Correspondingly, changes in supply distribution across different holder segments underscore evolving investor sentiment. Mid-sized whales (1,000–10,000 BTC) reduced holdings by nearly 69,700 BTC in February, highlighting broader institutional caution. This saw a reversal in March as prices saw a floor at $78,000.
Interestingly, smaller retail-oriented holders (0.1–1 BTC and 1–10 BTC) demonstrated resilience and cautious optimism during February’s downturn, collectively accumulating roughly 2,020 BTC. Moving into March, despite a mild price recovery (+3%), larger entities notably shifted strategies again—mid-sized whales aggressively re-entered, adding approximately 64,240 BTC, while the largest holders continued shedding positions (-14,880 BTC). These diverging strategies between retail accumulators and top-tier whales suggest retail investors see value around current levels, while the largest institutional entities remain cautious. Investors should interpret this divergence as a signal of ongoing market fragmentation, potentially setting the stage for increased volatility as institutions recalibrate exposure.
Divergent Investor Behaviors Signal Cautious Market Outlook
From January to March, the distribution of Bitcoin supply across different holder segments reflected a noticeable shift towards mid-tier institutional consolidation amid price volatility. Despite Bitcoin’s substantial decline from roughly $106,000 in January to around $87,000 by March, the supply controlled by medium-sized institutional holders (100–1,000 BTC) rose from 22.9% to 23.0%, with a peak at 23.2% in February. This steady accumulation indicates a strategic positioning from mid-sized entities capitalizing on lower valuations, signaling underlying institutional optimism despite broader market uncertainties.
Conversely, the largest whales (10,000+ BTC addresses) reduced their holdings from approximately 14.7% to 14.6% of total supply during the same period. Although their proportion remains significant, this cautious reduction—following more aggressive selling in February—suggests persistent uncertainty among the highest-tier investors. Smaller retail segments (0.1–1 BTC and 1–10 BTC holders), which collectively control about 16% of the supply, maintained relatively stable positions, reflecting resilience and long-term conviction despite recent volatility. Investors should interpret these dynamics as indicative of a market environment characterized by continued fragmentation: mid-tier institutions actively position for potential rebounds, retail investors maintain cautious optimism, and large-scale entities remain wary of lingering risks.
BTC ETF Outflows Slow Reverse Amid Bitcoin’s Price Volatility
Between February and March, Bitcoin’s price trajectory seriously impacted ETF flows. February saw broad outflows, reflecting heightened institutional caution. Notably, BlackRock reversed dramatically, shifting from January’s inflow of approximately 25,840 BTC to a sharp outflow of roughly 2,780 BTC, highlighting institutional repositioning in response to market instability. Fidelity intensified its selling, losing about 3,670 BTC in February, suggesting investors aggressively scaled back exposure amid heightened risk. Smaller providers like 21Shares (-4,140 BTC) and Bitwise (-2,970 BTC) echoed this trend, collectively underscoring growing market wariness.
March introduced nuanced shifts despite modest price stabilization. BlackRock’s outflows persisted, with another 4,190 BTC reduction, signaling continued institutional caution despite Bitcoin’s price recovery. Fidelity notably reduced selling pressure, losing just 260 BTC, possibly signaling tentative stabilization. Meanwhile, 21Shares bucked February’s trend, recording inflows of approximately 1,210 BTC, suggesting that select institutional investors began cautiously reaccumulating positions. Bitwise’s continued, though milder, outflows (-510 BTC) highlight lingering uncertainty. Smaller entities demonstrated fragmented strategies—Grayscale Mini (+830 BTC) contrasted sharply with reductions at Franklin Templeton (-960 BTC) and Valkyrie (-1,210 BTC). This divergence across ETFs indicates that institutions remain divided, carefully adjusting exposure amid uncertain market conditions.
Diverging March Flows Underscore Institutional Fragmentation
Across February, Ethereum's sharp price contraction to $2,500 prompted distinct shifts in ETF allocations. After January’s aggressive withdrawals, BlackRock notably reversed course, aggressively accumulating about 480,220 ETH—a stark contrast to January’s substantial outflow of roughly 605,560 ETH. Conversely, Bitwise (-102,600 ETH) and Fidelity (-12,010 ETH) sustained significant reductions, signaling lingering caution among several institutional players. Grayscale Mini emerged as an outlier, reversing January’s heavy selling (-346,725 ETH) to add about 165,640 ETH, highlighting selective confidence despite broader market bearishness.
March saw Ethereum's price stabilize near $2,000, yet ETF strategies fragmented further. While BlackRock moderated its accumulation pace, adding roughly 112,820 ETH, Fidelity intensified its withdrawals, offloading approximately 42,240 ETH. Bitwise continued reducing exposure (-219,050 ETH), underscoring persistent wariness. Conversely, Grayscale Mini aggressively scaled up its bullish stance, accumulating nearly 2,957,950 ETH, suggesting targeted optimism toward ETH’s recovery. Franklin Templeton (+106,770 ETH) and VanEck (+730 ETH) re-entered the market cautiously, contrasting Invesco’s sizable inflows (+39,380 ETH) following February’s modest selling. The pronounced divergence across ETF providers emphasizes a market still deeply uncertain, with institutional players distinctly split between cautious optimism and defensive positioning, potentially fueling continued volatility.
Binance Traders Turn Cautious Amid March Price Volatility
Throughout February, Binance’s long-short ratios consistently indicated bullish sentiment for BTC, ETH, and SOL, reaching peaks of approximately 2.94, 4.89, and 4.78 respectively near month-end. However, as prices sharply declined in March, sentiment notably shifted. Bitcoin fell from about $84,400 at February's end to lows around $78,300 before partially recovering to $86,900 by late March, coinciding with Binance's BTC long-short ratio dropping significantly, bottoming at an extremely bearish 0.82 on March 25th. This stark reversal highlights a dramatic reduction in trader confidence amid heightened volatility.
Ethereum’s price similarly declined from around $2,200 to lows below $1,900, before modestly stabilizing near $2,000. This prompted a corresponding decline in ETH's long-short ratio from 5.51 at the start of March to a low of 1.99, reflecting sharp bearish repositioning as optimism dwindled. Solana exhibited even greater sensitivity; prices dropped from around $148 to $112 before recovering slightly to $137. Trader sentiment closely followed, with SOL’s ratio collapsing from a robust 5.65 early in March to a bearish 1.95, signaling significantly reduced speculative activity and increased caution.
These dramatic reversals across BTC, ETH, and SOL emphasize that Binance traders have broadly shifted toward defensive positions. The markedly bearish sentiment could indicate traders’ anticipation of continued short-term volatility, potentially restraining significant upward momentum in prices until clearer bullish signals re-emerge.
Bybit Long Short Ratios Signal a Cautious Approach
In February, Bybit traders displayed consistent optimism in BTC, ETH, and SOL, with long-short ratios maintaining relatively stable bullish levels, notably peaking around 1.41 for BTC, 1.56 for ETH, and 1.55 for SOL near month's end. However, the pronounced decline in prices across cryptocurrencies in March significantly shifted sentiment. Bitcoin's decline from approximately $84,400 in late February to lows near $78,300 in early March prompted traders to progressively scale back bullish positions, with Bybit’s BTC long-short ratio decreasing sharply from 1.38 on February 28th to a bearish low of 1.08 on March 25th. This highlights cautious positioning as traders sought shelter from volatility.
Ethereum experienced a similar pattern, with prices declining from around $2,200 at February's end to below $1,900 before stabilizing near $2,000. Bybit’s ETH long-short ratio mirrored this decline, sliding from highs around 1.58 at the beginning of March to 1.37 near month's end. For Solana, the price drop from about $148 down to as low as $112 also resulted in traders significantly reducing their bullish exposure. SOL’s long-short ratio on Bybit contracted from a peak of approximately 1.53 to just 1.30 by March 25th, reflecting a cautious stance amid uncertainty.
The clear reduction in bullish positioning across BTC, ETH, and SOL on Bybit indicates heightened trader wariness, suggesting market participants remain defensive amid ongoing volatility.
BTC Funding Rates Reflect Shifting Market Sentiment
In February, BTC funding rates across major exchanges were predominantly positive, particularly towards month-end, reflecting bullish momentum as Bitcoin approached highs near $96,000. Notably, Bybit saw spikes up to 0.051 (Feb 22), and Binance maintained consistently positive funding, underscoring optimism.
In March, however, market sentiment notably shifted due to increasing volatility and declining prices, as Bitcoin fell sharply from around $94,000 to below $80,000 mid-month. Consequently, funding rates became mixed or negative. Binance and Bybit exhibited alternating positive and negative funding, with noticeable negative dips on Bybit BTCUSDT (-0.029 on Mar 10, -0.016 on Mar 14) highlighting short-term bearish pressures.
OKEx BTC-USDC swaps persistently showed negative funding through early March, indicating bearish positioning amid uncertainty. Huobi funding rates also turned sharply negative in mid-to-late March, dipping to -0.010 (Mar 25), indicating a cautious stance among traders. By month-end, rates slightly stabilized but remained muted compared to February.
Overall, the stark transition from mostly positive funding rates in February to mixed and often negative rates in March clearly illustrates a sentiment reversal, as traders turned cautious amidst heightened volatility and downward price movements, emphasizing increased uncertainty in Bitcoin’s short-term outlook.
ETH Funding Rates Reflect Elevated Volatility and Mixed Sentiment
February saw ETH funding rates fluctuate notably, initially dipping negative (Binance ETHUSDT -0.011 on Feb 4; Bybit ETHUSDT -0.0074 on Feb 8) amid sharp ETH price declines from $3300 to around $2700. This negative shift indicated bearish sentiment mid-month. However, by late February, funding rates rebounded positively across exchanges like Binance and Bybit, with frequent spikes of +0.01, reflecting renewed bullish confidence as ETH prices briefly stabilized above $2800.
In March, the narrative changed again. As Ethereum fell dramatically from $2500 to below $1800 within the first ten days, funding rates displayed increased volatility. While Binance's rates varied around neutrality, Bybit experienced stark contrasts, with funding swinging from strongly positive (+0.01 on Mar 4) to significantly negative (-0.015 on Mar 10, -0.0095 on Mar 7). OKEx ETH-USDC swaps persistently showed negative funding mid-March (-0.0148 on Mar 7), further highlighting bearish pressures.
By the latter half of March, funding stabilized slightly but remained uneven. Deribit maintained generally negative or negligible funding, suggesting cautious trader positioning. Huobi showed strong positive rates (+0.01 frequently), indicating divergent sentiment among platforms.
Overall, ETH’s March funding rate dynamics clearly reflect heightened uncertainty and mixed sentiment, with traders navigating price volatility through rapidly shifting bullish and bearish stances.
Solana Funding Dynamics Continue To Signal Escalating Risk
Solana (SOL) funding rates exhibited significant volatility, especially highlighted on February 4, with Binance SOLUSDC at -0.0599, Binance SOLUSDT at -0.0558, Bybit SOLPERP at -0.0374, Bybit SOLUSDT at -0.0317, and OKEx SOL-USDT-SWAP at -0.0416. This extreme negative spike coincided with a sharp SOL price correction, indicating intense bearish pressure early in the month. Despite occasional recoveries to positive territory mid-February (Binance SOLUSDC and SOLUSDT reaching +0.01 on February 23–28), market sentiment remained fragile.
In March, SOL funding rates showed continued instability, reflecting ongoing uncertainty. Exchanges like OKEx consistently displayed negative rates (notably -0.0244 on March 3 and frequent negative values between -0.01 and -0.014), suggesting persistent bearish positioning. Bybit rates oscillated significantly, with positive rates frequently hitting +0.01, but sharp negative dips such as -0.0181 (SOLUSDT, March 4) and -0.0385 (SOLPERP, March 7) revealed abrupt bearish turns. Deribit's SOL perpetual also exhibited substantial negative extremes, including -0.0307 on March 19.
SOL's funding rates, lately, generally show sharp sentiment swings and elevated uncertainty, characterized by aggressive bearish episodes followed by intermittent bullish rebounds.
AmberLens: intelligence.amberdata.com
Recent from Amberdata
Spot Market
Spot market charts were built using the following endpoints:
Futures
Futures/Swaps charts were built using the following endpoints:
DeFi DEXs
DeFi DEX charts were built using the following endpoints:
DeFi Borrow/Lend
DeFi lending charts were built using the following endpoints:
Networks
Network charts were built using the following endpoints:
The information contained in this report is provided by Amberdata solely for educational and informational purposes. The contents of this report should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax, or any other form of professional advice. Amberdata does not provide personalized recommendations; any opinions or suggestions expressed in this report are for general informational purposes only.
Although Amberdata has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, it cannot be held responsible for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or outdated information. Market conditions, regulations, and laws are subject to change, and readers should perform their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions or taking any actions based on the information provided in this report.
Past performance is not indicative of future results, and any investments discussed or mentioned in this report may not be suitable for all individuals or circumstances. Investing involves risks, and the value of investments can go up or down. Amberdata disclaims any liability for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of, or reliance on, the information contained in this report.
By accessing and using the information provided in this report, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless Amberdata, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, or expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising from your use of or reliance on the information contained herein.
Copyright © 2025 Amberdata. All rights reserved.